SPONSORED

Will arm go public or not?

Boris Johnson participates in latest attempt to take chipmaker public on London Stock Exchange - government officials fear impact on UK tech sector

•• 4 Min
Will arm go public or not?

Boris Johnson has joined a last-ditch push to persuade chip designer Arm to go public in London, as UK government officials worry about the lasting damage if Britain's best-known tech company chooses New York to go public.

London Stock Exchange ministers and executives have launched a charm offensive to persuade Arm's Japanese owner, SoftBank, to reconsider its strong preference for a listing in New York, the default destination for the world's biggest tech giants.

But even if the UK steps up its efforts, it is clear that the chances of avoiding the New York IPO are slim. SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son in February described the New York Nasdaq exchange as the "best fit" because it is "at the heart of the global high-tech industry."

The stakes are high for the government, and not just because Arm, which was founded and is headquartered in the UK, was previously listed in London before SoftBank acquired it for £24.6bn in 2016. There are also growing fears that a Wall Street listing would deal a blow to efforts to boost a tech sector in Britain, according to people familiar with the lobbying effort.

"Enormous efforts are being made," said one of the people involved. "They don't get any taller than Arm and it would be a huge blow if they left. It would send a very negative signal if they didn't choose to be listed here.

As part of the latest effort, according to people who those familiar with the matter wrote to SoftBank executives.The lobbying initiatives span a range of departments, including the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), the Treasury Department, the Business Department and Downing

Street Digital Secretary Chris Philp and Gerry Grimstone, the former Barclays chairman who now heads the UK Investment Office, are spearheading the lobbying effort

Philp and Grimstone are expected to meet with SoftBank executives again in the coming weeks, he said two people familiar with the plans, as well as senior executives at the LSE. "There is a political impetus, Arm for London eg u win," said one person familiar with the planned meetings. "The government is trying to boost tech sub-sectors - poor is a very relevant sector and it's also politically sensitive."

Theresa May's government waved the takeover of Arm through in 2016 after SoftBank pledged to keep jobs in the UK amid concerns the UK would lose one of its most valuable corporate crown jewels.

SoftBank is bringing Arm back to the stock market after a proposed $66 billion sale to California-based Nvidia fell through earlier this year after competition officials intervened.

Two people familiar with SoftBank's thinking said it was very unlikely to change plans and go public in London, adding that a listing in New York made more sense as there is a larger one there Number of retail investors resident.

Unlike in 2017, when London controversially offered an overhaul of listing rules to woo Saudi Aramco, regulators say there are no easy changes to arm lure. If the group were listed in London, it would quickly rise to the premium segment of the FTSE 100, where it would be the largest tech company.

This is an argument made by those involved in the lobbying: "In London it would be number 1. In the US there would be much bigger tech companies". They also added that UK investors would give Arm a healthy valuation as an established company rather than a loss-making start-up.

Those involved in the lobbying effort are also considering bringing together UK wealth managers to support the argument. Many London fund managers were investors in Arm when the company was listed in the UK.

Those involved have made it clear that they are fighting for Arm's primary listing and not a secondary listing of the shares, which would exclude Arm from the benchmark FTSE 100 index. "The big difference is the FTSE affiliation. Companies like Verizon and Worldpay have had ADRs [shares tied to a secondary listing] in London, but it's not the same thing.

A government spokesman declined to comment on individual cases, but said : "We want to make the UK the most attractive place for innovative companies to grow and raise capital." SoftBank, Arm and the LSE declined to comment.

ArmBoris JohnsonGreat Britain

Most Popular News

  1. SpaceX’s $8B Spectrum Deal Sends AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile Plummeting
  2. Is Project Vault Securing America’s Supply Chain or Squeezing It to the Breaking Point?
  3. Why Gautam Lohia Shifted from Global Consulting to Reboot a $20M Tech Micro-Cap
  4. Everyday Luxury, Unstoppable Scale: Aritzia Delivers 44% Net Revenue Growth
  5. Can Navy SEAL Leadership and Big Tech Scale Revolutionize Airborne Threat Detection?

Disclaimer


This report should not be viewed as investment advice or as an offer to buy or sell any securities or as an invitation or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. Neither the author of this report, its publisher, nor any other person associated with the publication of this report, are registered brokers, investment dealers, investment advisers, or financial advisers. The information in this report has not been tailored to the particular needs or circumstances of readers and should not be relied upon as investment advice or recommendations to purchase or sell any of the securities presented in this report. Readers seeking investment advice should contact qualified and registered brokers, investment dealers, investment advisers, or financial advisers prior to making any decision to buy or sell any of the securities referred to in this report. The information in this report should not be construed as investment, legal, or tax advice. No recommendation is made as to whether an investment in the presented securities is suitable for any reader in light of the reader’s particular circumstances.

Readers are cautioned that the publisher of this report covers exclusively securities that carry a high degree of volatility. Investing in such securities is highly speculative and carries a high degree of risk. Investors in such securities could lose all or a substantial portion of their investment. Only those investors who can afford to lose all or a substantial portion of their investment should consider investing in the securities referred to in this report.

This report may include information obtained from publicly available sources, including third-party reports or analysis. Neither the author nor publisher of this report, nor www.juniorstocks.com or its owners, have undertaken any independent investigation into the factual information used in this report, and the information in this report is provided without any warranty of any kind. No representations or warranties are provided regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this report. Statements of opinion or belief are those of the authors and/or publisher of this report. These statements of opinion or belief are expressions of the author’s and/or publisher’s judgment, and there is no guarantee that those judgments will turn out to be correct. No inference should be drawn that the author and/or publisher have any special or greater knowledge about the presented companies or their securities, or any particular expertise in the industries or markets in which the company operates. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and seek professional advice prior to investing in any securities presented on Juniorstocks.com.

Certain statements in this report constitute “forward-looking” statements. Forward-looking statements often, but not always, are identified by the use of words such as “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “targeting,” and “intend” and statements that an event or result “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” or “might” occur or be achieved and other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions, or future events or performance; they are not statements of historical facts and should not be viewed as any guarantee of any future result. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. The author and/or publisher of this report disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking statements in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events, or results or otherwise. There is no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

The information provided in this report is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to applicable law or regulation, or would subject the author or publisher of this report to any registration requirement in such jurisdiction or country.

Information about the editor of this publication:
Juniorstocks.com is a service provided by Piccadilly Capital Group, Office 66, 101 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7TB, UK. Piccadilly Capital Group is not the publisher of this report and was not paid for the publication of this report. Piccadilly Capital Group seeks to generate web traffic and a growing number of followers through the publication of articles or reports. Directors, officers, and other insiders of the publisher own an interest in Piccadilly Capital Group. Piccadilly Capital Group does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services, or securities of any company mentioned on www.juniorstocks.com. Piccadilly Capital Group will not share your information with any outside third parties. Due to the new data protection basic regulation, we ask you to read our data protection declaration carefully.

Note on copyright:
The contents published on this website and on connected media (e.g., e-mail, X, Facebook) are subject to applicable copyright and ancillary copyright laws. Any use not permitted by applicable copyright and ancillary copyright laws requires the prior written consent of the provider or the respective rights holder. In particular, this applies to the duplication, editing, translation, storage, processing, or reproduction of content in databases or other electronic media and systems. Contents and rights of third parties are marked as such. Unauthorized reproduction or transmission of individual contents or complete pages is not permitted and is punishable by law. Only the production of copies and downloads for personal, private, and non-commercial use is permitted. Links to the provider's website are always welcome and do not require the consent of the provider of the website. Photos and images on the website may not be shared unless the publisher itself has acquired the initial rights from authorized sources. The presentation of this website in external frames is only allowed with written permission. If you notice any violations, please inform us. Please note: The content of our articles, emails, or other publications or social networks such as X, LinkedIn or Facebook is exclusively intended for the designated addressee(s). If you are not the addressee of these articles, emails, or other publications in the market letter or social networks such as Twitter or Facebook or his or her legal representative, please note that any form of publication, reproduction, or distribution of the content of these articles, emails, or other publications in the market letter or social networks such as X, LinkedIn or Facebook is prohibited. Falsifications of the original content of this message during data transmission cannot be excluded in principle.